Just watch this. It's NEW HAMPSHIRE LISTENS. Except they don't wanna listen unless you agree. This is a terrific video--sixteen minutes long. Just in case you weren't sure if it was your imagination when you got ignored or mocked at a Visioning Meeting put on by the consultant hired with your tax dollars to propagandize you---take a look at this article recounting the experience of members of the public who dared to disagree with the New Hampshire version of regional planning: Granite State Future. They were accused by the local throw-away paper of 'crashing a public meeting.' This is a neat trick when you 're a member of the public who was invited to the meeting, but obviously you're only welcome if you are willing to go along to get along or are a cheerleader for the plan. As usual the facilitators didn't want anyone filming their supposed public meeting because they don't want a record of dissent. No, they just want to say that the public was invited to the meeting, attended the meeting, liked the plan, and FULL SPEED AHEAD. Too bad. The New Hampshire Tea Party Coalition was very much in attendance.
FROM The New Hampshire Tea Party Coalition: http://www.nhteapartycoalition.org/tea/2013/03/09/how-do-you-crash-an-open-house-just-ask-the-nhtpc/ On February 24, 2013 we posted this open invitation from the Lakes Region Planning Commission. It was to be an open house for a public discussion on “Granite State Future”, a statewide project among all of the the state’s nine regional planning commissions, coordinated by the Nashua Regional Planning Commission. The project is funded through a $3.37 million federal grant from the EPA/HUD/DOT. The invitation stated: “The purpose of the Open House is to provide an opportunity for the LRPC Commissioners, local officials, and the public to meet LRPC staff and talk about the Granite State Future Project and LRPC’s ongoing planning work that will inform the development of the Lakes Region Plan.” So you can imagine how surprised we were to wake up the next day and see this misleading headline from the Laconia Daily Sun for an article fraught with some pretty curious contradictions: “Tea Party members crash LRPC Open House” Excerpt: MEREDITH — An open house at the Lakes Region Planning Commission’s office on the regional planning agency’s role in the Granite State Future project turned into a media event last night as local Tea Party activist Tim Carter grilled Kim Koulet, the LRPC’s executive director, about the project as Ed Comeau of Government Oversite Cam filmed the question-and-answer session. Koulet at first had said that filming the discussion wouldn’t be permitted as it was not a public meeting but after objections were raised that the open house was taking place in a public facility filming was allowed to take place. We find it rather strange LRPC Vice Chairman Warren Hutchin’s claim that the GSF plan comes “from the ground up” when the regional planners are unelected boards with no authority, and yet, can manage to bypass local officials while rejecting local input on proposed new laws, ordinances, and fees outlined in their documentation of goals and objectives. The fact that their “listening sessions” are often “facilitated” by hired corporate PR firms is another red flag. Few residents are even aware of these sessions which usually end up being attended mostly by public officials and companies who hope to gain work from the projects. Hutchins’ claim that “the regional plan will be based on input from the 30 local communities” seems inconsistent with the fact that Carter and others like him find that their objections are not welcome. So far most input from the communities has been ignored, defying any such claim that the ideas are coming from the “ground up”. We didn’t vote these regional planners in, and thus we can’t vote them out. How is this kind of lawmaking even legal? How is this the “NH Way”? WELL, WHAT DO YOU SAY, FOLKS? IS THIS THE AMERICAN WAY? STAND UP. SHOW UP. SPEAK OUT. REFUSE TO COLLABORATE. Cody Wilson, a law student in Austin Texas, has used a 3D printer to make a magazine for a semi-automatic weapon. His act is revolutionary because it moves beyond the political philosophy of Progressives and reactivates the fundamental ideology of the US Constitution--that of individualism. Regardless of your opinion on gun ownership you will appreciate his analysis of the concept of revolution. All revolutionary activity is a terrorist act, to the ruling regime. No government in power can be expected to give its permission for a revolution. The more repressive a regime the wider the range of activities that are considered to be terrorism. When is the 'right time' to act? Please watch his lecture: Although the following article from the Plumas County News could be better, it's not as bad as most mainstream press reports. Read it to see what your fellow citizens are doing to block UN Agenda 21 in their town.
Group fears general plan conspiracy - Wants county to start over Debra Moore Staff Writer 1/23/2013 Fearing that Plumas County’s new general plan could lead to a loss of private property rights, a group of concerned citizens wants to trash the document and begin again. With the Plumas County supervisors just weeks away from approving the updated general plan, the Indian Valley Citizens for Private Property Rights appeared before the Planning Commission on Jan. 17 and laid out their arguments. About 60 people packed the small conference room at the planning department with most standing, and some spilling into the hallway. Their spokeswoman, Carol Viscarra, gave a PowerPoint presentation outlining the group’s concerns and highlighting why the new general plan is Agenda 21 in disguise. Agenda 21 is a 300-page document adopted in 1992 at United Nations Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The document is designed to be a blueprint of how jurisdictions worldwide should move toward sustainable economic growth that simultaneously protects and renews environmental resources. Explaining that she was not a political activist, but rather an emergency room nurse and third-generation rancher, Viscarra was nervous. But “I believe it’s my civic duty” to come forward, she said. After several months of page-by-page review, she said it’s her conclusion that the general plan “seems to mirror almost verbatim Agenda 21.” There has been a growing theory that Agenda 21 is a conspiracy to take away individual property rights and move people off the land to urban centers. During her presentation, Viscarra presented a map that showed vast expanses of California as off-limits to the public, wide swaths that were treated as buffer zones to be heavily regulated, with only zones around San Francisco, Los Angeles and Fresno that remained unrestricted. “Eighty-six percent of the land will be set aside as wildlife corridors,” Viscarra said. Because 71 percent of Plumas County’s land mass is already in the public domain, Viscarra said Plumas County is an ideal locale for Agenda 21 to take root. “Be informed. Be courageous. Read about Agenda 21 and study it for yourselves,” Viscarra told those gathered. “The stealth of this organization is upon us in Plumas County.” She said that the local planning commission members and supervisors “emphatically deny” any relationship with Agenda 21, and she believes them. She attributes the inclusion of Agenda 21 language in the general plan to the consultants that help jurisdictions write planning documents and organizations that provide grants. She said the words “Agenda 21” never appear in such documents, but words such as “sustainability,” “open space,” “mixed-use housing” and “sustainable development,” which she describes as the “most egregious,” are all indicators of its influence. “They will never, ever call it Agenda 21,” she said. Viscarra said that the process began in Plumas County back in 2002 as local leaders embarked upon Vision 2020, with the aid of outside grants. There were meetings and scoping sessions and language terms such as sustained growth and development became more common. She said that in the county’s general plan update, the words “open space” are used 121 times, “sustainable” 77 times and “the county shall” is used 430 times. She said that the general plan also has “a lot of references to climate change” another popular theme in Agenda 21. Viscarra said that timber regulations, which restrict forestry practices in the county, are a good example of how Agenda 21 is already being implemented without people being aware. Addressing the ranchers in the room, she said, “If you’re not worried, it’s because you’re not paying attention.” She added, “I looked at the general plan through the prism of a rancher, but this should be a concern to all businesses.” Applause greeted the conclusion of her presentation. B.J. Pearson, a former county supervisor and developer in the eastern portion of the county, said, “This is one of the best presentations I have ever seen,” and suggested that she should make the presentation in each district. Sheriff Greg Hagwood agreed and described the presentation as “one of the most succinct and accurate” that he had seen. “I thought I would spend the bulk of my time protecting people against burglars,” Hagwood said. Instead, he said he found himself protecting people “from their own government. I encourage the Board of Supervisors to put strong language in the general plan regarding private property rights.” Many in the audience echoed Viscarra’s concerns about private property rights and the new general plan. “My understanding is that this plan doesn’t need to be approved until 2015,” Sheila Groethe said. “I ask you to trash this and write a new general plan appropriate to Plumas County.” As some of the comments began to degenerate and one man said implementing Agenda 21 to was tantamount to treason, County Counsel Craig Settlemire, who had attended the meeting, stepped in. “Everyone here is working to uphold our oaths and the Constitution,” he said. Senior Planner Becky Herrin, who represented the planning department at the meeting, thanked everyone for attending, but added that she wished they had been “here for the last seven years.” The planning department had held multiple meetings throughout the process including meetings in each community. She said that when the meeting was held in Indian Valley no members of the public attended. Her department is now in the process of writing responses to all of the comments that have been submitted for the environmental document associated with the general plan. She said many accuse the general plan of going too far, while others believe that it isn’t restrictive enough. When the document is complete, a hearing will be scheduled before the Board of Supervisors. How this latest protest impacts the process is unclear. The deadline for filing comments has passed, but during the Jan. 17 meeting, Planning Commission Chairwoman Betsy Schramel invited those present to put their concerns in writing. In Sebastopol, California, the City Council has just passed an emergency ordinance that classifies the installation of Smart Meters as a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine of $500. Yes, the INSTALLER would pay the fine! The Police Chief has announced that if called to the scene of an installation he will enforce the new ordinance.
The California Public Utilities Commission is in the process of deciding whether it will permit whole municipalities to opt out of the installation of the meters. According to Sebastopol's City Manager, about 50 cities in California have adopted similar ordinances, including Berkeley and Santa Monica. READ MORE HERE The Honorable Ann Bressington, Australia, gives a brilliant speech educating her nation on UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. Watch and share. Listen to a Canadian radio interview on UN Agenda 21 in Canada This is a graphic expression of one of the many Happiness Indexes floating around on the web. Green is happy, red is miserable. Looks like the Central Americans, Ecuadorans, and Mexicans have the lock on happiness from this map... Have they had any school shootings? Or just wars and drug violence?
Everyone is asking 'Why are these kids going crazy and shooting up schools?' Let's consider some potential reasons. For the last 20 years, with increasing frequency and intensity, children have been taught that the planet is dying and that they are the cause. They're also taught that they have the power to save the planet. Considering the fact that children are the most powerless of all people, this is an irresponsible thing to teach a child. The pressure and responsibility of saving the planet is fierce. Children are fearful, stressed, and learning non-violent communication at the same time that they are playing violent computer games. They are told that everyone is equal but that they are bad (unfair) if they have more than someone else. They're taught that bullying is bad and then they're uncertain about exactly what they can say and what they can't. Children are taught to trust community, and are also told that there are people who would steal them away--strangers who look just like everyone else. Children are taught sustainable development principles from the time that they're in kindergarten. These principles are in every course and continue on until post-graduate school. I was sent a book that is used in third grade: Rethinking Mathematics. This book teaches students that every point of view is valid and should be considered, even when it is mathematically incorrect. Is two plus two equal to five? Let's give that some consideration because no one should be made to feel wrong. What this does is to destroy certainty. Mathematics is beautiful because no matter how many times you do a calculation, if it's done correctly you'll get the same answer every time. Certainty. The joy of certainty is destroyed for children, and rigidity is substituted in its place. Rigidity in thinking 'sustainably.' Just like most people, children are on drugs. Mind altering, psychotropic drugs that many of them expect to be on for the rest of their lives. Many of these anxiety drugs have 'side-effects.' What is a side effect? The risk that psychological collateral damage may result from taking something to make you feel better---it's a mind-altering Russian roulette. And sometimes the guns are real. The world is a dangerous place. Artificial scarcity, panic over global warming, fear that farmland and water sources are disappearing--all of this is UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. Fear is a vital element of this plan. Panic is necessary to block your ability to think clearly and to question. You must act. How can you be happy when you're taught that children are starving in Ethiopia and baby wolves are being killed and it's because you're using too much water when you're brushing your teeth? Children are being used as levers to change society and manipulate their parents. UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the green mask--the vision of the glorious future. The joy of future sustainability--how beautiful it will be when we all ride bikes and take the train and live in apartments on the train line and work at non-profits that operate on the Triple Bottom Line: Planet, People, Profit. We will no longer think about gross national product; we will think about our Gross National Happiness. Oh, glorious day when we will beat our swords into plowshares and return to peasantry. Oh, the Neo-Feudal state we will enjoy when 'education' is openly and totally about behavioral modification and training. We are there. This is the state of the 'educational system' now with Direct Instruction, Common Core, Mastery Learning, Outcome Based Education. Children are being manipulated. Their open and impressionable minds are being taught to think in consensus, to be manageable and measurable and predictable and to answer the question the right way and to value sustainability above all else or the planet will die. They must be HAPPY. It's the New Poverty! It's the Peace on Earth! You must analyze every feeling and then share it with everyone in your class, children, because how will we know that you're HAPPY? Children are being driven insane in schools. The following is from the Malaysian Happiness Index. Musing on the question posed by Ernest Hancock at Freedom's Phoenix: Should one stay and fight or flee? This is my article for his magazine: As you can imagine I've thought about this a lot. It's a bit like asking whether you'd like to eat a nice meal or dig a ditch. Of course you'd rather eat, but there's that work that must be done. In the case of fighting to expose and stop UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development in your city and nation, the truth is that there is nowhere to go that isn't implementing it, now. UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. INVENTORY AND CONTROL. You won't see it called Agenda 21--it is a stealth plan in plain sight; a global plan that is implemented locally. When you're looking for it remember: Inventory and control. We're not quite at square one anymore and people all over the world are speaking out and identifying what Agenda 21 looks like in their town. Whether it's called Horizon 2025 or PlanNY or OneBayArea, or Imagine Calgary or Hanoi Center Regional Plan 2030, it's the same plan. And the same Delphi mind-control technique is used to get you to accept the plan for regional governance: visioning. Visioning techniques are designed to indoctrinate you with a pre-determined viewpoint while giving you the impression that your input was taken and that you crafted the plan. This is manufactured consensus. Regional governance is the stepping stone to global governance. You might see UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development as an internet 'protection' law like Bill C-30 in Canada--supposedly designed to protect children from internet predators--a domestic spying bill. When the same sort of thing was announced in the UK objectors were accused of having something to hide. Where else would you find it? Agenda 21 looks like Smart Meters and the Smart Grid forcibly installing meters on your home or, if you're lucky, charging you not to do that. You'll see the Happiness Index, which is a mental health assessment that is being conducted without parental consent. Or how about genetically modified crops being sold without your knowledge? Carbon taxes are beginning to wend their way into your life, slowly, and you'll find that you'll be paying more to fly or to drive (vehicle miles traveled taxes) until you can't afford it. Asset based community development will measure your willingness to volunteer and eventually penalize you if you don't. You'll see Agenda 21 as 'green jobs' that don't materialize unless mandated and paid for with your taxes or fines; green energy loans that enrich a few manipulators; non-recourse loans for green energy---like Solyndra and all of the other solar panel companies that took the money and ran. Let's not forget about land use restrictions that change the game right in the middle, right after you've spent every penny you had on a dream that evaporates in fees, fines, penalties, and studies. The truth is that there is no Switzerland in this fight. No easy way out, no Shangri-La that you can run to. You can stand tall and know that when the time came, you were right here, where you should be. Standing up for yourself and the future of your world. Because you don't buy the rhetoric that says that if you don't give up your rights you'll kill the planet. You understand that the environmental movement has been hijacked. And you know that it isn't sustainable to suck the life out of people and turn their world into a museum--or a gulag. You also understand that global governance is a recipe for the destruction of individual liberty, and that is not the legacy you will leave this world. It's better to engage in this struggle now than to wait. Every one of us needs to educate ourselves and each other and join in. We don't know what it will take to reach critical mass on awareness, but it looks like 2013 will be the year that we achieve it. Throwing the blinders off and having the courage to dissent is far more than our duty. It is our life. Rosa Koire is the executive director of the Post Sustainability Institute. Rosa speaks across the world and is a regular blogger on her website Democrats Against UN Agenda 21. She is the author of BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: UN Agenda 21. If you've read my book you know that I discuss the National Park Service's intense dedication to removing Drakes Bay Oyster Company from the Point Reyes National Seashore including falsifying claims. The Oyster Company, under various ownerships, has been operating for nearly 90 years in this location, which was made a National Seashore about 30 years ago. They farm sustainably, are local, and family-owned. Drakes Bay Oyster Company had a long term lease with the National Park Service---which expired two days ago. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar decided not to renew the lease. This political drama has played out on the national stage as more and more people recognize UN Agenda 21 when they see it.
I've been a member of a local gay women's email list for about 15 years and am often at odds with Communitarians posting on it. Over the past few weeks I responded to women who were urging others to sign an online petition to get Drakes Bay Oyster Company out of the bay to 'save the bay.' We fought it out online. Here's the exchange (I'm blue and they're green): The petition to save the estuary, and end the commercial oysterfarm,isat:http://www.change.org/organizations/turtle_island_restoration_network_2 Time to return this area, so close to SF, to most wilderness possible. There are other places to buy oysters. Drakes Bay Oyster Company produces 40% of the oysters consumed in California. I'm sure you see yourself as protecting the environment, but you are being misled. From my book BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: UN Agenda 21; "Drake’s Bay is in northern California on the Point Reyes Peninsula. This gorgeous ocean front peninsula is part of the Point Reyes National Seashore. The Drake’s Bay Oyster Company has harvested oysters from the bay for over 70 years. Their lease with the National Park Service is about to expire in 2012 so they asked for an extension. Unfortunately for them, the National Park Service wants to declare the area a ‘designated wilderness area.’ According to the National Forestry Service, US Department of Agriculture, a ‘designated wilderness area is defined this way: Wilderness is “an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.” An area of wilderness is further defined in the Wilderness Act to mean “an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvements or human habitation, which is protected and managed so as to preserve its natural conditions and which (1) generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable; (2) has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation; (3) has at least five thousand acres of land or is of sufficient size as to make practicable its preservation and use in an unimpaired condition; and (4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” There’s a problem there, as you can see. The Drake’s Bay Oyster Company has been at that location for seven decades, about three decades more than the National Seashore has been in existence. The area is now a ‘potential designated wilderness’ so the Park Service wanted to do its inventory and see if it could further restrict uses to ‘visitors who do not remain.’ If they could remove all permanent improvements in the National Seashore they’d be able to change the status to ‘designated wilderness.’ To that end they planted a surveillance camera on the bay and recorded the movements of the employees of the oyster farm hoping to find violations. Although they recorded more than 250,000 images none of them showed damage to the harbor seals or the environment. So what did the Park Service do? They hid that information so that they could say that the oyster farm was a threat to the environment and should lose their lease. The San Francisco Chronicle newspaper reported on March 24, 2011 that: Sen. Dianne Feinstein accused the U.S. Department of the Interior on Wednesday of downplaying evidence of misconduct by National Park Service scientists who apparently wanted to get a popular shellfish operation kicked out of Drakes Bay. The Interior Department's office of the solicitor released a report Tuesday outlining what it termed biased, improper, mistake-ridden work by scientists. But it concluded that the behavior did not rise to the level of intentional "scientific misconduct" - and that nothing criminal occurred. The headline called it a “mistake” but it wasn’t, was it? It was deliberate, and it was done in order to declare an area ‘wilderness.’ Untrammeled. Primeval. Primitive. Wildlands. ---Behind The Green Mask: UN Agenda 21 available on Amazon, Kindle, and Nook. Rosa Koire GET THE OYSTER FARM, a major polluter of Point Reyes, OUT OF DRAKE'S BAY NOW!!!!!!! Drake's Bay Oyster Company has lost their lease. This operation has been in existence at this location for over 80 years. It is a sustainable, local, food producer. Watch this video on Drake's Bay Oyster Company. Believing dogma without facts does no credit to those who seek the truth. We all need to be conscious of efforts to manipulate those of us who identify as environmentalists. http://vimeo.com/52331881 For those of you who are not knowledgeable about the National Park Service I suggest you do some research. And for those of you who believe that no one should have a business or make a profit you might want to re-examine your belief system. This manipulation of data by the National Park Service is a crime. Rosa Koire I think this is a very complicated subject, with no clear right or wrong. Drake's Bay Oyster has been in the area for decades, and I enjoyed going there regularly for many years. But the company was sold about 7 or 8 years ago to a company that knew the lease was poised to expire. It didn't make a lotta business sense to me. I think the best upshot of this discussion has been to underscore the need to examine issues from multiple perspectives, and to avoid being entrenched in a position without doing the research. Does it matter who owns the lease? The terms were designed so that it was renewable, and the land originally belonged to farmers and ranchers in the area, including the Lunny family, who had granted it to the National Park Service with the understanding that they could continue. This fight is predicated on fabricated information and an agenda. That should concern everyone concerned with social justice and the environment. If you can't trust your government you are vulnerable. It may be 'complicated' but we are sharp, intelligent members of our community and we are not afraid to follow the truth wherever it leads us. I agree with you: things that sound good to us may be designed that way for a reason--and with the hope that we will not look further. Rosa Koire Jeez I'm getting tired of this. Get over it! The decision has been made, for the greater good I might add. It was not decided on fabricated info. It was predicated on an agreement 40 years ago! Also did you bother to read Salazar's decision? http://www.doi.gov/news/pressreleases/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&pageid=332286 Yes, Judi, of course I did. And you may say it was for the common good or the greater good but I bet you want to be the one to define what that is. I'm sure someone could point to your life and identify things that don't forward the common good. That 40 year old agreement was a lease that was renewable. The terms were favorable, that was why the owners of the Oyster Farm and all of the ranchers agreed to it in the first place. It just knocks me out that those of us who are out there fighting for rights, social justice, the 99% , local food, non-GMO, no WTO, etc don't see it when the rhetoric is twisted in the government's favor on an issue that sounds good to us. It's not that hard to do some research and see what this is about. Inventory and control. Investigating issues of justice can be tiring but that is the task of an informed electorate. Rosa As a kayaker, I am rejoicing. The rays you can see while kayaking won't have to deal with the silt desturbed when their oyster metal envelopes are dragged on the bottom. The leopard sharks will appreciate it too! Now if we can just get rid of the COWS in our parks! I can see that you are not disturbed by the idea of violating property rights. I can imagine you being in favor of denial of building permits on someone's property because you can see it from a trail while riding your bike. Rosa, Thanks for your persevering and tireless work of educating all of us stubborn folks in denial. Though we may not always speak up, we do appreciate. You have educated me about Agenda 21, and I will pass it on! much love & blessings Vicky Davis, the brilliant researcher and analyst whose website Channeling Reality.com is a fabulous source of information, has written an important article on the conversion of the Old World Order to the New World Order and what that means. She uses the words of Sun Tzu, 6th century BCE military strategist, to illustrate her analysis.
Sun Tzu's War by Vicky Davis ... To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself. Sun Tzu When I use the word logical, it doesn't always mean that something is logical. In the parlance of the Information Systems world, logical means not physical. For example, an Indian Reservation can be defined as a logical island. It is part of the whole territory, but it's a separate, segregated area that is for all practical purposes, is a landlocked island under a different civil authority with their own culture and norms. Definition is critical to communication so that we don't talk past each other. If you can't define it, then you don't fully understand it and you can't fix or fight what you don't understand. If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle. Recently, I was finally able to define in clear and concise terms the meaning of the New World Order relative to the Old World Order. The Old World Order is a world organized into nation-states with state being defined as a geographical location with borders, sovereign and independent from the rest of the world. The New World Order is a world organized into "market states" with state being defined as a condition of being rather than a geographical location. The term Community is often used but a better and more descriptive term is Common Market. That term is studiously avoided because it might cause people to make the connection with the European Union - elimination of national sovereignty for the countries in Europe - replaced by a political and economic union (merger) which is the effective description of a "market state". All warfare is based on deception. A conversion from the Old World Order to the New World Order required(s) breaking down the institutions of the old and either eliminating them completely or reconfiguring them to fit a new system of governing that is compatible with the Common Market system. This disintegration of our institutions of the public and private sector has been on-going for over a quarter of a century. The political leadership of this country cast these changes as "reforms" thereby deceiving the people they were supposed to represent. TO READ MORE PLEASE CLICK HERE: http://www.channelingreality.com/NWO_WTO/sun_tzu.htm The truth about Smart Meters--Canadian presentation lays it out brilliantly. REFUSE SMART METERS. DO IT. Sent to us recently:
Farming and Food Tyranny In The Land Of 'No' Posted on April 26, 2012 by Michael Patrick McCarty Farmers in Southern New Jersey Can Find Their Farming Options To Be Severely Limited Because of Wetlands Designation Under The Pinelands Protection Act. My younger brother owns a thirty acre blueberry farm in southern New Jersey, and recently, we have discussed the possibilities of combining forces. He, with his blueberries, and my wife and I with our expertise in poultry, egg, and squab production, together with the addition of any other farm crops that would surely find a ready market in the local area. It is the “garden state”, after all, and if you have never had the pleasure of the legendary “Jersey Tomato”, then you have missed one of the world’s great culinary treats. It sounded like a grand idea, at least on the hypothetical and hopeful face of it. However, just under the surface of it all lurked the state of New Jersey’s well deserved reputation for over regulation, government over reach, bureaucratic red tape, and corruption. READ MORE Every once in a while someone will comment on YouTube that I may be 'controlled opposition.' I want to address this directly.
What is controlled opposition? When someone names the problem and then proposes UN Agenda 21 as the solution--that is controlled opposition. Example? THRIVE. That popular film describes what is happening now, validates every 'conspiracy theory', and makes you feel confident that the film is on the right track. If you notice, it never mentions UN Agenda 21 once in the entire film. Take a look at the last 1/4 of THRIVE. It proposes collective living, consensus governance, no borders, rethinking progress--it proposes UN Agenda 21 as the solution to the problem. Yes, this is all integral to the successful continued implementation of UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. The film, in my opinion, was made because we are breaking through to the mainstream. It was made as a diversion. That is controlled opposition. What's another example of controlled opposition? Someone who cautions you not to name UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development as the source of your local comprehensive plans, and of regional government plans. This is a person who tells you that if you name it, you'll be considered crazy and not taken seriously. This is intended to redirect you and others away from the fact that UN Agenda 21 is a global totalitarian plan implemented locally. This controlled opposition technique keeps you in the weeds stumbling along instead of sailing strong against the current. Now, I believe that those who are wrongly labeling me as controlled opposition fall into two camps. They are either ignorant or they are themselves controlled opposition. I am speaking out in a message that is clear, strong, fact-based, and unchanging. I advocate for courage and resistance in the face of those who would attempt to shame, libel, embarrass, or hide the truth. STAND UP. SPEAK OUT. BE THE RESISTANCE. Rosa being interviewed by Reuters International journalist Nick Carey. He published a biased article on UN Agenda 21 suggesting that it's only opposed by right wing un-hinged Tea Party fanatics. He deliberately did not report on this interview so that he could publish a smear. This is a classic media attack that appeared in many newspapers and news organs. This one is in the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/15/agenda-21-tea-party_n_1965893.html Read the article and then broadcast this to show the truth. |
And the winner is...What is UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development? Archives
January 2021
Categories
All
|
|
NOTE: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Articles may be republished as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact. 2010-2020 COPYRIGHT ROSA KOIRE
|